Mr Morrison told The Australian of an alternative
approach that would give the states 10 per cent of the
income-tax proceeds while giving the commonwealth a
slice of the GST revenue. The Treasurer’s idea breaks
with the past on the allocation of GST proceeds and
abandons the idea that an impost on goods and services
is a “state tax” that should go entirely to the states
and territories. For the first time, the commonwealth
would keep some of the receipts for itself.
Next year’s income-tax revenues are estimated to be
about $200bn and next year’s GST revenues will be about
$60bn — with all of the GST proceeds going to the
states.
“The sort of change you’d be talking about could enable
the states to get $40bn out of the consumption tax and
$20bn from income tax, which would be 10 per cent of the
income-tax revenues,” Mr Morrison said. “So they would
have a diversified revenue base out of the commonwealth,
and as things changed over time they would have their
risks spread.”
That would leave the commonwealth with $20bn from the
GST proceeds, about one third of the total.
The talks on the tax swap are separate from the
long-running dispute over how to divide the GST pie
between the states, as West Australian Premier Colin
Barnett seeks a bigger share of the receipts despite
fierce objections from Tasmanian Premier Will Hodgman
and others. If the commonwealth suggestion gains ground,
it would be a departure from Tony Abbott’s longstanding
argument that the GST was a “matter for the states” and
the position adopted by the Howard government, which
regarded the GST as a “state tax” and did not include it
in its tally of federal revenue.
The change would also make it easier for Malcolm
Turnbull and the Treasurer to explore lifting the GST
rate from 10 to 15 per cent or expanding the GST base to
health and education, making this a unilateral reform
and keeping the additional proceeds for the
commonwealth.
Given the Prime Minister’s pledge that the poor would be
shielded from the impact of any GST increase, the
federal government would have to use some of the revenue
to offer welfare payments to low-income households, with
the rest being used to fund tax cuts for workers.
Mr Turnbull met the premiers and chief ministers and Mr
Morrison met state and territory treasurers in Sydney
earlier this month, setting deadlines of February and
March to make more progress on a deal. Treasury
secretary John Fraser discussed options with his state
counterparts in a confidential heads of Treasury meeting
last week with the division of income taxes a high
priority, those aware of the meeting told The Australian
yesterday.
A Treasury analysis will be prepared over summer to
deliver on a request from South Australian Premier Jay
Weatherill and Treasurer Tom Koutsantonis, backed by
other state leaders, to examine the benefits of giving
states a permanent share of the income tax revenue.
NSW Premier Mike Baird has voiced some support for the
South Australian proposal, although he also wants an
increase in the GST to be considered.
Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews and Queensland Premier
Annastacia Palaszczuk have pushed for an increase in the
Medicare levy — in effect, lifting the personal income
tax rate for people on high incomes — but last week’s
meeting made it clear this did not have enough support
to proceed.
The South Australian proposal to share income tax would
give the states and territories 17.5 per cent of the
revenue, reducing federal intervention in how it was
spent. While the original proposal left room for the
federal government to increase the GST and use the
proceeds for its own ends, it did not canvass giving the
federal government a share of the existing GST.
Source::: The Business Spectator, dated
23/12/2015.